Why Do Afro-American People Dominate in US Sports

Why Do Afro-American People Dominate in US Sports? Usually, when the question is about who is a better sportsman – a white or black one – people tend to prefer the latter one. Why so? To talk about the racial differences (physical and cultural) it is important to say that in the past it was all about the discrimination excuses. Nowadays, the dominancy of black sportsmen is no wonder anymore, but still this aspect makes people think what the reason of black dominancy is. Nevertheless, the majority of scientists in the United States of America are not really concerned with the study of the white black people’s physical differences. However, the black athletes’ obvious superiority brings up two main questions – are they really better than the athletes with white skin? If it is true, then why is it so? O.J. Simpson, for example, has no doubts concerning the racial differences that he has surveyed. According to his words, black athletes are built in a little bit different way. They have longer legs, skinnier calves, which means they were created for speed and, as we know, in the majority of kinds of sport the speed factor is a crucial one. Joe Morgan has also said some words about the differences between blacks and whites. In accordance to his ideas, the main difference between these people lies in the psychological reasons. That is why black people have better speed and agility. For such sports like basketball, baseball and football those features are of number one importance. The black athletes are definitely superior in such situations. It seems like they were created to be able to do more things than the rest. For example, they have no equals in basketball jumping note (65 % of NBA players are Afro-American). To my mind, the main reason why black sportsmen are superior over the rest lies in the fact that they are naturally more capable of endurance and if to talk about numbers, there’s 80% of physiological factor and 20% of sociological, which makes them faster, stronger and better sportsmen!

Accounting Book Review - 1100 Words

Accounting Book Review (Book Review Sample) Content: Name:Instutution:Alex Berenson, the author of the book Numbers, a graduate of Yale University attained a degree in both economics and history. He worked for The Denver Post and The Street.com and later he went to work as a reporter in the year 1999. In this book, Alex gets to analyze the mistakes that took place in corporate America. He also examined the patterns that connected Tyco, Enron, Computer Associates and other corporate scandals.However, according to the book the "Numbersà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ , it explains how many investors never know anything about how the stock market works until they get to lose their money or property in the stock market, and by that they are all left asking the question what happened to their investments. Therefore, Alex tries to explain how the USA stock market got to lose $8 trillion in three years. Todayà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬s view of how the stock market lost such amount of money is said to be inevitable due to the random rise of the stock in the 19 90à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬s. However, in the book it is said that, calamities like these might be seen happening more often in the future and that investors should be ready to find a solution in case it ever happens. One of the biggest question the book makes use ask ourselves is how did investors change irrational and started making big investments? According to the question, it is hard to say that investors were lured due to a change in technology and all that was promised to come with the "new eraà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ , since there was also an evident rise in technology industries at that time. However, due to lack of a strong answer to the question, "why the stock market was hità ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ , the only possible thing left to blame was fraud. After blaming the stock market hit on fraud, questions like this arose, "to what limits were investors coned by accountants who were loyal to their corporate employers?" and also were security analyst forced to give affirmative feedback on stock written by the ir own investment bankers? Moreover, to what extent were executives willing to lie and steal to increase their stock value.The title of this book the "Numberà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ , can be used to describe a companyà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬s profit that is given to each outstanding share of the stock. The readers of this book are also told that "cult of the number" is what has been making things unclear on Wall Street. As you read the last chapter of the book. In this book from the chapter, the boom of 1920 up to the chapter in the book titled "truth," the number is arranged as a long series of the stock market. In the beginning chapters, they show how the governments un- proportional efforts to come up with a method to implement a common ground for all accountants in order to multiply financial disclosure.In the chapter titled "The Number Is Born," Alex elaborates how readers can easily understand the exited market of the late 1990à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬s, they should know about a prior series of event. He also sa ys the commissions that brokers got while any transactions were fixed. Therefore, since the brokers had no competition, they switched their competition, and they all changed to doing research. Alex judgment reached the limits in the 1960à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬s and early 1970à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬s. He says in those days, "Institutional investors used their commissions to sponsor over $100 million researches every yearà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ . However, this changed on 1 May, 1975. On this report it shows that, on this day, the justice department antitrust action got rid of fixed commissions, and with this, there was the introduction of discount brokers, and they also lowered trading profits. In the early 1980à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬s, the market moved up, and brokerage companies had less quit doing researches. At this time, the only complaints people were gettin... Accounting Book Review - 1100 Words Accounting Book Review (Book Review Sample) Content: Name:Instutution:Alex Berenson, the author of the book Numbers, a graduate of Yale University attained a degree in both economics and history. He worked for The Denver Post and The Street.com and later he went to work as a reporter in the year 1999. In this book, Alex gets to analyze the mistakes that took place in corporate America. He also examined the patterns that connected Tyco, Enron, Computer Associates and other corporate scandals.However, according to the book the "Numbersà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ , it explains how many investors never know anything about how the stock market works until they get to lose their money or property in the stock market, and by that they are all left asking the question what happened to their investments. Therefore, Alex tries to explain how the USA stock market got to lose $8 trillion in three years. Todayà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬s view of how the stock market lost such amount of money is said to be inevitable due to the random rise of the stock in the 19 90à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬s. However, in the book it is said that, calamities like these might be seen happening more often in the future and that investors should be ready to find a solution in case it ever happens. One of the biggest question the book makes use ask ourselves is how did investors change irrational and started making big investments? According to the question, it is hard to say that investors were lured due to a change in technology and all that was promised to come with the "new eraà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ , since there was also an evident rise in technology industries at that time. However, due to lack of a strong answer to the question, "why the stock market was hità ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ , the only possible thing left to blame was fraud. After blaming the stock market hit on fraud, questions like this arose, "to what limits were investors coned by accountants who were loyal to their corporate employers?" and also were security analyst forced to give affirmative feedback on stock written by the ir own investment bankers? Moreover, to what extent were executives willing to lie and steal to increase their stock value.The title of this book the "Numberà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ , can be used to describe a companyà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬s profit that is given to each outstanding share of the stock. The readers of this book are also told that "cult of the number" is what has been making things unclear on Wall Street. As you read the last chapter of the book. In this book from the chapter, the boom of 1920 up to the chapter in the book titled "truth," the number is arranged as a long series of the stock market. In the beginning chapters, they show how the governments un- proportional efforts to come up with a method to implement a common ground for all accountants in order to multiply financial disclosure.In the chapter titled "The Number Is Born," Alex elaborates how readers can easily understand the exited market of the late 1990à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬s, they should know about a prior series of event. He also sa ys the commissions that brokers got while any transactions were fixed. Therefore, since the brokers had no competition, they switched their competition, and they all changed to doing research. Alex judgment reached the limits in the 1960à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬s and early 1970à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬s. He says in those days, "Institutional investors used their commissions to sponsor over $100 million researches every yearà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ . However, this changed on 1 May, 1975. On this report it shows that, on this day, the justice department antitrust action got rid of fixed commissions, and with this, there was the introduction of discount brokers, and they also lowered trading profits. In the early 1980à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬s, the market moved up, and brokerage companies had less quit doing researches. At this time, the only complaints people were gettin...